<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pundit to Critic: Fuck You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A Arkansawyer</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>John A Arkansawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>Jon, it isn&#039;t in the engagement. It&#039;s that Friedman tells the tech crowd what they want to hear. Kristof doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, it isn&#8217;t in the engagement. It&#8217;s that Friedman tells the tech crowd what they want to hear. Kristof doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>Make me #4 to the above. We&#039;re missing half the story here. Don&#039;t see it on any other blog. I don&#039;t really care. I already found Friedman a bit arrogant, and found it odd when I saw that he is regularly feted by the tech crowd while his peer Kristof is the better engager. (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://civilities.net/TimesSelect-ForeignCorrespondence&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TimesSelect &amp; Foreign Correspondence&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make me #4 to the above. We&#8217;re missing half the story here. Don&#8217;t see it on any other blog. I don&#8217;t really care. I already found Friedman a bit arrogant, and found it odd when I saw that he is regularly feted by the tech crowd while his peer Kristof is the better engager. (see <a href="http://civilities.net/TimesSelect-ForeignCorrespondence" rel="nofollow">TimesSelect &amp; Foreign Correspondence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Websnacker</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>Websnacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>I second Lars. It would be nice to see the larger picture and judge if Friedman&#039;s outburst was justified. On many occasions, a &#039;fuck you&#039; becomes necessary and I can personally vouch for it. In fact, I exactly did the same but on a different level.

Ross Fortune
http://twitter.com/websnacker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Lars. It would be nice to see the larger picture and judge if Friedman&#8217;s outburst was justified. On many occasions, a &#8216;fuck you&#8217; becomes necessary and I can personally vouch for it. In fact, I exactly did the same but on a different level.</p>
<p>Ross Fortune<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/websnacker" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/websnacker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>Dan, how often do I make the point that A-listers have no check on their being abusive and bullying to everyone else &quot;below&quot; them? (right, too often ...) Given the lack of crucial details in the above, it sounds like the worst type of special pleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, how often do I make the point that A-listers have no check on their being abusive and bullying to everyone else &#8220;below&#8221; them? (right, too often &#8230;) Given the lack of crucial details in the above, it sounds like the worst type of special pleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2009/03/31/pundit-to-critic-fuck-you/#comment-2991</guid>
		<description>&quot;comment on a question posted there that challenged the Times’ credibility in a fairly general and nasty way.&quot;

Without the actual question (which you don&#039;t mention) or the tone in which it was delivered, it is hard to judge whether Friedman&#039;s fuck you was justified.

C’est le ton qui fait la musique, as the French say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;comment on a question posted there that challenged the Times’ credibility in a fairly general and nasty way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without the actual question (which you don&#8217;t mention) or the tone in which it was delivered, it is hard to judge whether Friedman&#8217;s fuck you was justified.</p>
<p>C’est le ton qui fait la musique, as the French say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

