<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reporter Solicits Sources Via Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/12/10/reporter-solicits-sources-via-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/12/10/reporter-solicits-sources-via-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/12/10/reporter-solicits-sources-via-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1589#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>Right you are. Department of the obvious: Bloggy guy uses Twitter to reach sources.

re: &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/om/status/1049504817&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this tweet&lt;/a&gt;, is on Om&#039;s page but it&#039;s suffixed with @dangillmor. I&#039;m still unfamiliar with Twitter&#039;s syntax: Does that mean reply &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt; dangillmor, or reply &lt;i&gt;from&lt;/i&gt; dangillmor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are. Department of the obvious: Bloggy guy uses Twitter to reach sources.</p>
<p>re: <a href="http://twitter.com/om/status/1049504817" rel="nofollow">this tweet</a>, is on Om&#8217;s page but it&#8217;s suffixed with @dangillmor. I&#8217;m still unfamiliar with Twitter&#8217;s syntax: Does that mean reply <i>to</i> dangillmor, or reply <i>from</i> dangillmor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/12/10/reporter-solicits-sources-via-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2831</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1589#comment-2831</guid>
		<description>Jon, I&#039;m not denying that he has &quot;reporter&quot; as one of his attributes. Rather, I&#039;m pointing out that the headline is misleading by implication by using that attribute, since that then implies the &lt;em&gt;generic&lt;/em&gt; attribute is most relevant.

This is the kind of headline the Onion parodies sometimes, where they run stories like &quot;Area Catholic Denounces Violent Christianity&quot; (&quot;claiming extremist Christians have misunderstood the message of Jesus, Mr. Smith says only a small minority follow the so-called Crusader theology&quot;).

A generic reporter couldn&#039;t effectively do what Malik did, because the generic reporter would be ignored. So &quot;reporter&quot; is not the key attribute.

The subtext is part of the hype campaign for Twitter  - it&#039;s useful for &lt;em&gt;news&lt;/em&gt;! But it isn&#039;t, except as it&#039;s useful for A-listers and data-mining the chat of their demographic, which is very different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, I&#8217;m not denying that he has &#8220;reporter&#8221; as one of his attributes. Rather, I&#8217;m pointing out that the headline is misleading by implication by using that attribute, since that then implies the <em>generic</em> attribute is most relevant.</p>
<p>This is the kind of headline the Onion parodies sometimes, where they run stories like &#8220;Area Catholic Denounces Violent Christianity&#8221; (&#8220;claiming extremist Christians have misunderstood the message of Jesus, Mr. Smith says only a small minority follow the so-called Crusader theology&#8221;).</p>
<p>A generic reporter couldn&#8217;t effectively do what Malik did, because the generic reporter would be ignored. So &#8220;reporter&#8221; is not the key attribute.</p>
<p>The subtext is part of the hype campaign for Twitter  &#8211; it&#8217;s useful for <em>news</em>! But it isn&#8217;t, except as it&#8217;s useful for A-listers and data-mining the chat of their demographic, which is very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/12/10/reporter-solicits-sources-via-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1589#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>As GigaOM has a masthead, VC funding, prior journalism experience, I think Mr. Malik&#039;s reportorial qualifications on paper are beyond doubt.

Of course, we&#039;re told, journalism is a verb (um, a process). Step 1 is soliciting information (ooh... he used Twitter). Step 2 is forming words &amp; sentences (or creative use of Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V) and hitting submit. In this case, he didn&#039;t quite make it to this crucial second step-- I didn&#039;t see any story.

In fact, he punted: &quot;I was unable to bring myself to participate in the morbid and nearly gleeful frenzy that turned victimization of Yahoo faithful...&quot; He merely linked to techmeme. Kara Swisher, she of the vulture MSM culture, already had a dozen impassioned  emails by then and &lt;a href=&quot;http://kara.allthingsd.com/20081210/another-sad-day-for-yahoo-layoffs-begin-while-employees-vent/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whipped up a story&lt;/a&gt; (um, blog post).

Malik&#039;s intrepid sense of journalistic ethics should serve his patrons at Alloy Ventures well: never waste time on a story done to death!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As GigaOM has a masthead, VC funding, prior journalism experience, I think Mr. Malik&#8217;s reportorial qualifications on paper are beyond doubt.</p>
<p>Of course, we&#8217;re told, journalism is a verb (um, a process). Step 1 is soliciting information (ooh&#8230; he used Twitter). Step 2 is forming words &amp; sentences (or creative use of Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V) and hitting submit. In this case, he didn&#8217;t quite make it to this crucial second step&#8211; I didn&#8217;t see any story.</p>
<p>In fact, he punted: &#8220;I was unable to bring myself to participate in the morbid and nearly gleeful frenzy that turned victimization of Yahoo faithful&#8230;&#8221; He merely linked to techmeme. Kara Swisher, she of the vulture MSM culture, already had a dozen impassioned  emails by then and <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20081210/another-sad-day-for-yahoo-layoffs-begin-while-employees-vent/" rel="nofollow">whipped up a story</a> (um, blog post).</p>
<p>Malik&#8217;s intrepid sense of journalistic ethics should serve his patrons at Alloy Ventures well: never waste time on a story done to death!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/12/10/reporter-solicits-sources-via-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2829</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1589#comment-2829</guid>
		<description>The headline is misleading. It should be &quot;A-lister&quot;, not &quot;Reporter&quot;.

I spent some time figuring out why this bugged me, and then I realized it&#039;s another example of the oligarchy (aka. &quot;IF YOU&#039;RE NOT ON THE A-LIST, YOU DON&#039;T GET HEARD!&quot;). &quot;Reporter&quot; conjures up an image that&#039;s not the sort of subcultural celebrity that&#039;s really at work here. That is, the average reporter wouldn&#039;t be able to use this well, since they wouldn&#039;t have the sort of local fame that Malik does.

That is, the headline sounds like this is useful for a &lt;em&gt;generic&lt;/em&gt; reporter, but the item is really more a &quot;things A-listers like&quot; sales-pitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline is misleading. It should be &#8220;A-lister&#8221;, not &#8220;Reporter&#8221;.</p>
<p>I spent some time figuring out why this bugged me, and then I realized it&#8217;s another example of the oligarchy (aka. &#8220;IF YOU&#8217;RE NOT ON THE A-LIST, YOU DON&#8217;T GET HEARD!&#8221;). &#8220;Reporter&#8221; conjures up an image that&#8217;s not the sort of subcultural celebrity that&#8217;s really at work here. That is, the average reporter wouldn&#8217;t be able to use this well, since they wouldn&#8217;t have the sort of local fame that Malik does.</p>
<p>That is, the headline sounds like this is useful for a <em>generic</em> reporter, but the item is really more a &#8220;things A-listers like&#8221; sales-pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

