<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Ad Practice at WashingtonPost.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/30/poor-ad-practice-at-washingtonpostcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/30/poor-ad-practice-at-washingtonpostcom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley J. Fikes</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/30/poor-ad-practice-at-washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley J. Fikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1557#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>Scripts are sometimes desirable, so I prefer Adblock.

I also use Flashblock, which gives you the option to view a Flash item by clicking on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scripts are sometimes desirable, so I prefer Adblock.</p>
<p>I also use Flashblock, which gives you the option to view a Flash item by clicking on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/30/poor-ad-practice-at-washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1557#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>There is something much better than adblock-NOSCRIPT.  It stops all scripts from running on the webpage.  I haven&#039;t seen a popup ad like that in ages after installing it in Firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something much better than adblock-NOSCRIPT.  It stops all scripts from running on the webpage.  I haven&#8217;t seen a popup ad like that in ages after installing it in Firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/30/poor-ad-practice-at-washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1557#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>Dan,

Online ads will succeed either by getting more targeted or  obnoxious, or both. It has seemed sensible to me that newspapers can spare this for paying subscribers; this would also encourage more readers to get a &quot;subscription&quot; for online reading. I call this mechanism &lt;a href=&quot;http://civilities.net/PaperTrust&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PaperTrust&lt;/a&gt;.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>Online ads will succeed either by getting more targeted or  obnoxious, or both. It has seemed sensible to me that newspapers can spare this for paying subscribers; this would also encourage more readers to get a &#8220;subscription&#8221; for online reading. I call this mechanism <a href="http://civilities.net/PaperTrust" rel="nofollow">PaperTrust</a>.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NM</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/30/poor-ad-practice-at-washingtonpostcom/comment-page-1/#comment-2794</link>
		<dc:creator>NM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1557#comment-2794</guid>
		<description>This is the reason why I use AdBlock Plus. I hesitated for a while before installing it, since so many sites rely on advertising to live, but if they can&#039;t be bothered to do something about obnoxious ads, well it&#039;s their own damn fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the reason why I use AdBlock Plus. I hesitated for a while before installing it, since so many sites rely on advertising to live, but if they can&#8217;t be bothered to do something about obnoxious ads, well it&#8217;s their own damn fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

