<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia as Vital Breaking News Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#160; links for 2008-12-01&#160;&#8212;&#160;contentious.com</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/comment-page-1/#comment-2793</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; links for 2008-12-01&#160;&#8212;&#160;contentious.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1550#comment-2793</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia as Vital Breaking News Source – Center for Citizen Media &quot;Also: Once I wondered whether Wikinews would be a valuable journalism source. It’s increasingly clear that Wikipedia itself is vastly more important when it comes to major events. Compare the Wikipedia entry above to the Wikinews Mumbai entry, and you’ll see why.&quot; (tags: wikis news credibility breaking+news tidbits+fodder) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia as Vital Breaking News Source – Center for Citizen Media &quot;Also: Once I wondered whether Wikinews would be a valuable journalism source. It’s increasingly clear that Wikipedia itself is vastly more important when it comes to major events. Compare the Wikipedia entry above to the Wikinews Mumbai entry, and you’ll see why.&quot; (tags: wikis news credibility breaking+news tidbits+fodder) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musing about Twitter and crises and participation</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/comment-page-1/#comment-2792</link>
		<dc:creator>Musing about Twitter and crises and participation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1550#comment-2792</guid>
		<description>[...] in 2002, makes two critical points about the difference between social media and MSM in his post Wikipedia as Vital Breaking News Source: one, the significantly higher frequency of updates in social media and two, the incredible [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2002, makes two critical points about the difference between social media and MSM in his post Wikipedia as Vital Breaking News Source: one, the significantly higher frequency of updates in social media and two, the incredible [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Where the news is breaking&#8221; &#171; Mordennau</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Where the news is breaking&#8221; &#171; Mordennau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1550#comment-2791</guid>
		<description>[...] mentre Charles Arthur (sempre sul Guardian; molto interessante anche il pezzo di Jessica Reed) e Dan Gilmor notano soprattutto l&#8217;accuratezza e la velocità della pagina dedicata agli eventi da [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentre Charles Arthur (sempre sul Guardian; molto interessante anche il pezzo di Jessica Reed) e Dan Gilmor notano soprattutto l&#8217;accuratezza e la velocità della pagina dedicata agli eventi da [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piet Bakker</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/comment-page-1/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>Piet Bakker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1550#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>I was even more fascinated by the Coveritlive reporting done on some websites. Dutch free daily De Pers had the minute by minute account running in its story on Mumbai. Felt as if you were very close. See: http://tinyurl.com/6qgp5d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was even more fascinated by the Coveritlive reporting done on some websites. Dutch free daily De Pers had the minute by minute account running in its story on Mumbai. Felt as if you were very close. See: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6qgp5d" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6qgp5d</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Time Citizen Journalism in Mumbai Terrorist Attacks &#124; Gauravonomics Blog</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/comment-page-1/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Time Citizen Journalism in Mumbai Terrorist Attacks &#124; Gauravonomics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1550#comment-2789</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Gillmor has written a nice post onthe role of Wikipedia as a news breaking source in the Mumbai terrorist attacks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Gillmor has written a nice post onthe role of Wikipedia as a news breaking source in the Mumbai terrorist attacks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaurav Mishra</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/26/wikipedia-as-vital-breaking-news-source/comment-page-1/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaurav Mishra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1550#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>@Dan: Yes, Wikipedia, along with Twitter and NowPublic, has been the most important source of news updates on the Mumbai terrorist attacks. Here&#039;s a roundup of social media citizen journalism coverage on the Mumbai terrorist attacks: http://www.gauravonomics.com/blog/real-time-citizen-journalism-in-mumbai-terrorist-attacks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan: Yes, Wikipedia, along with Twitter and NowPublic, has been the most important source of news updates on the Mumbai terrorist attacks. Here&#8217;s a roundup of social media citizen journalism coverage on the Mumbai terrorist attacks: <a href="http://www.gauravonomics.com/blog/real-time-citizen-journalism-in-mumbai-terrorist-attacks/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gauravonomics.com/blog/real-time-citizen-journalism-in-mumbai-terrorist-attacks/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
