<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Anonymous Critics ARE Cowards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/09/these-anonymous-critics-are-cowards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/09/these-anonymous-critics-are-cowards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/09/these-anonymous-critics-are-cowards/comment-page-1/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1526#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>re: &quot;It’s a perfect example of why anonymous critics should not be taken seriously&quot;... (...)... &quot;The anonymous comment on a blog or news article deserves less than no credibility.&quot;

you are just as wrong on this, no matter how many times you repeat it... (for some odd reason you keep forgetting that the quality of the criticism is what makes it deserving or undeserving, not the source per se -- makes me think you want to discredit critics... period! and pointing-out anonymity is just a convenient pretext...).

Delia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: &#8220;It’s a perfect example of why anonymous critics should not be taken seriously&#8221;&#8230; (&#8230;)&#8230; &#8220;The anonymous comment on a blog or news article deserves less than no credibility.&#8221;</p>
<p>you are just as wrong on this, no matter how many times you repeat it&#8230; (for some odd reason you keep forgetting that the quality of the criticism is what makes it deserving or undeserving, not the source per se &#8212; makes me think you want to discredit critics&#8230; period! and pointing-out anonymity is just a convenient pretext&#8230;).</p>
<p>Delia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/09/these-anonymous-critics-are-cowards/comment-page-1/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1526#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>Speaking for many, Josh Marshall explained why he couldn&#039;t help but echo this story:

&quot;Part of me thinks I shouldn&#039;t be watching Fox News reporter and sometimes fabulist Carl Cameron dishing the McCain campaign&#039;s dirt on Sarah Palin. But well, when Mothra goes up against Godzilla, how can you not watch?&quot;

(28 hours later, after posting a reader comment, he fesses up to being &quot;more than a little skeptical myself.&quot;)

That&#039;s the &quot;echo-sphere&quot; for ya: how can you not watch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking for many, Josh Marshall explained why he couldn&#8217;t help but echo this story:</p>
<p>&#8220;Part of me thinks I shouldn&#8217;t be watching Fox News reporter and sometimes fabulist Carl Cameron dishing the McCain campaign&#8217;s dirt on Sarah Palin. But well, when Mothra goes up against Godzilla, how can you not watch?&#8221;</p>
<p>(28 hours later, after posting a reader comment, he fesses up to being &#8220;more than a little skeptical myself.&#8221;)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the &#8220;echo-sphere&#8221; for ya: how can you not watch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTDarling</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/09/these-anonymous-critics-are-cowards/comment-page-1/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>CTDarling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1526#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon really who really cares, Palin was meeted out with the calibre and content of her own campaign lies which really may be the point here in this volley of un-owned fluff (Africa&#039;s not a country?)( she deserves such). Yes, certainly it is deplorable but look at so much of the coverage ; sound bite city, thin info , sensationalistic drivel which one has to say Fox  loves to up their numbers with; the &quot;lot less filling&quot; bombastic sensationalistic uneven-ness of quasi journalism thrown into their mix so when one sums it up from FOX; What were you expecting? Quality journalism Please. Everyone knows they need a serious house cleaning @ Fox to be taken seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon really who really cares, Palin was meeted out with the calibre and content of her own campaign lies which really may be the point here in this volley of un-owned fluff (Africa&#8217;s not a country?)( she deserves such). Yes, certainly it is deplorable but look at so much of the coverage ; sound bite city, thin info , sensationalistic drivel which one has to say Fox  loves to up their numbers with; the &#8220;lot less filling&#8221; bombastic sensationalistic uneven-ness of quasi journalism thrown into their mix so when one sums it up from FOX; What were you expecting? Quality journalism Please. Everyone knows they need a serious house cleaning @ Fox to be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Windsor</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/11/09/these-anonymous-critics-are-cowards/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Windsor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1526#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>Dan,

I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. Forget the partisan nature of the attacks, for a journalist to use such quotes as anything more than background information to drive an investigation that ends at facts and details that can be attributed and verified is just lazy journalism. That it appears in one of the top two news weeklies is doubly disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. Forget the partisan nature of the attacks, for a journalist to use such quotes as anything more than background information to drive an investigation that ends at facts and details that can be attributed and verified is just lazy journalism. That it appears in one of the top two news weeklies is doubly disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
