<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Moyers on Media&#8217;s Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/06/07/bill-moyers-on-medias-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/06/07/bill-moyers-on-medias-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2008/06/07/bill-moyers-on-medias-future/comment-page-1/#comment-153406</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/?p=1373#comment-153406</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if there is common ground to be found. We should pursue transparency, indeed. But many of the left-of-center media critics found fault with the media being *too* combative during the Clinton administration. From September 2002 to May 2004, it was seen as not combative enough. I just suspect that a *lot* of media criticism (but not all) is based on the circumstances of the day.

I was looking for the transcript of Bill Moyers's speech. I found &lt;a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/41347" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dan Rather's&lt;/a&gt; from the same conference.  It starts promisingly: "And when you hear me criticize and critique the press, please know that I do not exempt myself from these criticisms."

Well, let's see if he delivers the goods:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
I only found out years after the fact, for example, about the pressure that the Nixon White House put on my then-bosses, during Watergate — pressure to cut down my pieces, to call me off the story, and so on... because, back then, my bosses took the heat, so I didn't have to.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whoa. With the allegations from Jessica Yellin and Katie Couric about news execs pressuring reporters, perhaps Rather could shed some light on his personal experience in the last decade? He can't even name names of whom those executives were? Not even a comment that he couldn't comment because of the (self-serving) lawsuit he filed against CBS and Viacom? There's nothing in this talk even remotely approaching a mea culpa like this: "Well, as you know, I've had a lot of time on my hands, and I watched the tapes of myself during those 6 months leading to war." Nothing to say whether he had come across Landay and Strobel in that time.

Whatever. Journalism's Bg Feet have a right to mail in their speeches. But nobody notices this; nobody wants to crack the unified front of media criticism. Greg Mitchell, writing in E&amp;P, &lt;a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003813671" rel="nofollow"&gt;stenographs it in&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if there is common ground to be found. We should pursue transparency, indeed. But many of the left-of-center media critics found fault with the media being *too* combative during the Clinton administration. From September 2002 to May 2004, it was seen as not combative enough. I just suspect that a *lot* of media criticism (but not all) is based on the circumstances of the day.</p>
<p>I was looking for the transcript of Bill Moyers&#8217;s speech. I found <a href="http://www.freepress.net/node/41347" rel="nofollow">Dan Rather&#8217;s</a> from the same conference.  It starts promisingly: &#8220;And when you hear me criticize and critique the press, please know that I do not exempt myself from these criticisms.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s see if he delivers the goods:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I only found out years after the fact, for example, about the pressure that the Nixon White House put on my then-bosses, during Watergate — pressure to cut down my pieces, to call me off the story, and so on&#8230; because, back then, my bosses took the heat, so I didn&#8217;t have to.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoa. With the allegations from Jessica Yellin and Katie Couric about news execs pressuring reporters, perhaps Rather could shed some light on his personal experience in the last decade? He can&#8217;t even name names of whom those executives were? Not even a comment that he couldn&#8217;t comment because of the (self-serving) lawsuit he filed against CBS and Viacom? There&#8217;s nothing in this talk even remotely approaching a mea culpa like this: &#8220;Well, as you know, I&#8217;ve had a lot of time on my hands, and I watched the tapes of myself during those 6 months leading to war.&#8221; Nothing to say whether he had come across Landay and Strobel in that time.</p>
<p>Whatever. Journalism&#8217;s Bg Feet have a right to mail in their speeches. But nobody notices this; nobody wants to crack the unified front of media criticism. Greg Mitchell, writing in E&amp;P, <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003813671" rel="nofollow">stenographs it in</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
