<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media in Beat Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>Got it, thanks.. (referring to now-deleted spam).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it, thanks.. (referring to now-deleted spam).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>Dan-- you&#039;ve apparently attracted a spammer-commenter above who is so clever that he has copied the precise phrase from my 75-word comment above which contained a typo. The word &quot;been&quot; is missing between &quot;have&quot; and &quot;simpler.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan&#8211; you&#8217;ve apparently attracted a spammer-commenter above who is so clever that he has copied the precise phrase from my 75-word comment above which contained a typo. The word &#8220;been&#8221; is missing between &#8220;have&#8221; and &#8220;simpler.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/11/14/social-media-in-beat-reporting/#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>I have two humble suggestions. One, since there are demonstrably already many beat-blogging-with-social-network efforts, it might have simpler to survey them at a distance first. The comments left on the BeatBlogging.org &quot;wall&quot; lend an air of collusion.

Two, I&#039;d be curious to see what the planned metrics are. Two years ago I had put together a 4-part series &lt;a href=&quot;http://civilities.net/ClassifyingParticipatoryMedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Questions for Participatory Media&lt;/a&gt; which I left as an open model for any researcher to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two humble suggestions. One, since there are demonstrably already many beat-blogging-with-social-network efforts, it might have simpler to survey them at a distance first. The comments left on the BeatBlogging.org &#8220;wall&#8221; lend an air of collusion.</p>
<p>Two, I&#8217;d be curious to see what the planned metrics are. Two years ago I had put together a 4-part series <a href="http://civilities.net/ClassifyingParticipatoryMedia" rel="nofollow">Questions for Participatory Media</a> which I left as an open model for any researcher to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

