<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Newspaper Trick Backfires in Blogging Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/16/old-newspaper-trick-backfires-in-blogging-round-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/16/old-newspaper-trick-backfires-in-blogging-round-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Olav A. Øvrebø</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/16/old-newspaper-trick-backfires-in-blogging-round-up/#comment-150893</link>
		<dc:creator>Olav A. Øvrebø</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/16/old-newspaper-trick-backfires-in-blogging-round-up/#comment-150893</guid>
		<description>This criticism is exaggerated. The WSJ piece takes the edge off its own periodisation by noting that it is an imperfect exercise and that "proto-blogs" existed before 1997 (Marc Andreessen recently reminded us of that - take a look at this &lt;a href="http://wp.netscape.com/home/whatsnew/whats_new_0693.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;page from 1993&lt;/a&gt;). Maybe the WSj had a thin excuse for running a blogiversary article, but they did a very fine job with the selection of bloggers and pundits who actually have a lot of substantial things to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This criticism is exaggerated. The WSJ piece takes the edge off its own periodisation by noting that it is an imperfect exercise and that &#8220;proto-blogs&#8221; existed before 1997 (Marc Andreessen recently reminded us of that - take a look at this <a href="http://wp.netscape.com/home/whatsnew/whats_new_0693.html" rel="nofollow">page from 1993</a>). Maybe the WSj had a thin excuse for running a blogiversary article, but they did a very fine job with the selection of bloggers and pundits who actually have a lot of substantial things to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
