<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffett All But Writes Off Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between &quot;news&quot; and &quot;newspapers,&quot; true. But the business model supporting newspapers is the most difficult competitive threat, not journalism competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between &#8220;news&#8221; and &#8220;newspapers,&#8221; true. But the business model supporting newspapers is the most difficult competitive threat, not journalism competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>from as business perspective... as in... you couldn&#039;t have possibly made money by selling printed newspapers if such forms of delivering info as cable, satellite and internet would have been around first...?

still, I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s true... it seems to assume a bunch of things: that everybody would have had access to cable/satellite/internet when they wanted to access news; that in all circumstances they would have preferred this form of delivery to print on paper etc.

Delia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from as business perspective&#8230; as in&#8230; you couldn&#8217;t have possibly made money by selling printed newspapers if such forms of delivering info as cable, satellite and internet would have been around first&#8230;?</p>
<p>still, I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s true&#8230; it seems to assume a bunch of things: that everybody would have had access to cable/satellite/internet when they wanted to access news; that in all circumstances they would have preferred this form of delivery to print on paper etc.</p>
<p>Delia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>From a business perspective? I definitely do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a business perspective? I definitely do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Dan, do you agree with him?

Delia

P.S. I&#039;m not even sure what he&#039;s really saying... re: &quot;if cable and satellite broadcasting, as well as the Internet, had come along first, newspapers as we know them probably would never have existed.”

well... yeah, hard to argue with the &quot;newspapers *as we know them&quot; part...&quot; (that would be true for any innovation) but what does he mean by &quot;newspapers&quot;? the particular form of delivering of info (print on paper)?; the kind of topics covered? manner of presenting the news? without making clear what he means, his statement sounds empty to me...  D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, do you agree with him?</p>
<p>Delia</p>
<p>P.S. I&#8217;m not even sure what he&#8217;s really saying&#8230; re: &#8220;if cable and satellite broadcasting, as well as the Internet, had come along first, newspapers as we know them probably would never have existed.”</p>
<p>well&#8230; yeah, hard to argue with the &#8220;newspapers *as we know them&#8221; part&#8230;&#8221; (that would be true for any innovation) but what does he mean by &#8220;newspapers&#8221;? the particular form of delivering of info (print on paper)?; the kind of topics covered? manner of presenting the news? without making clear what he means, his statement sounds empty to me&#8230;  D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Buffett: &#8220;If The Internet Had Come Along First, Newspapers As We Know Them Probably Would Never Have Existed&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Buffett: &#8220;If The Internet Had Come Along First, Newspapers As We Know Them Probably Would Never Have Existed&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/03/05/buffett-writes-off-newspapers/#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Gillmor adds: &#8220;It’s a sobering assessment from the world’s most famous investor.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Gillmor adds: &#8220;It’s a sobering assessment from the world’s most famous investor.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

