Comments on: Trusting Who, Exactly? http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/ Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:40:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Innovation in College Media » Blog Archive » Digital audit trail for photojs? http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-878 Innovation in College Media » Blog Archive » Digital audit trail for photojs? Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:21:03 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/#comment-878 [...] UPDATE: Dan Gillmor is less than enthused about the technological approach to authenticity. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...] [...] UPDATE: Dan Gillmor is less than enthused about the technological approach to authenticity. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]

]]> By: Delia http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-877 Delia Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:21:28 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/#comment-877 Dan, do you mean you don't think they *could* succeed with THIS? re:" I am pleased to announce today that we are working with Adobe and Canon to create a solution that enables photo editors to view an audit trail of changes to a digital image, which is permanently embedded in the photograph, ensuring the accuracy of the image." this looked like the most promising thing to me (from what they were talking about) -- some of the other things are just funny... especially this (the doctoring up of pictures) being a big surprise for them! "How could this have happened and what can we do to prevent it happening again?" My hunch is that it had something to do with assuming people just wouldn't give in to temptation when faced with the opportunity... and doing close to nothing to prevent that from happening... "We conducted a review which concluded this was a case of an individual photographer, ignoring Reuters rules, and embellishing two photographs for aesthetic, not political, reasons." bad review! (time to wake up and face the facts...) Delia Dan,

do you mean you don’t think they *could* succeed with THIS?

re:” I am pleased to announce today that we are working with Adobe and Canon to create a solution that enables photo editors to view an audit trail of changes to a digital image, which is permanently embedded in the photograph, ensuring the accuracy of the image.”

this looked like the most promising thing to me (from what they were talking about) — some of the other things are just funny… especially this (the doctoring up of pictures) being a big surprise for them!

“How could this have happened and what can we do to prevent it happening again?”

My hunch is that it had something to do with assuming people just wouldn’t give in to temptation when faced with the opportunity… and doing close to nothing to prevent that from happening…

“We conducted a review which concluded this was a case of an individual photographer, ignoring Reuters rules, and embellishing two photographs for aesthetic, not political, reasons.”

bad review! (time to wake up and face the facts…)

Delia

]]> By: The Real Paul Jones » CEO of Reuter’s on Citizen Journalism http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/comment-page-1/#comment-876 The Real Paul Jones » CEO of Reuter’s on Citizen Journalism Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:05:54 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/12/13/trusting-who-exactly/#comment-876 [...] Glocer’s talk via Dan Gillmor and the Center for Citizen Media. Dan has his reservations about parts of the talk. [...] [...] Glocer’s talk via Dan Gillmor and the Center for Citizen Media. Dan has his reservations about parts of the talk. [...]

]]>