<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Laws Vary on Polling Place Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: essblog 2 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Election Day Links</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-150341</link>
		<dc:creator>essblog 2 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Election Day Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-150341</guid>
		<description>[...] to vote? Here&#8217;s the city&#8217;s poll finder! Don&#8217;t use Diebold! Request paper ballots. Compiled laws about voting places by state including journalistic freedoms Diebold machines causing problems at polling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to vote? Here&#8217;s the city&#8217;s poll finder! Don&#8217;t use Diebold! Request paper ballots. Compiled laws about voting places by state including journalistic freedoms Diebold machines causing problems at polling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Law students offer Election Day tips for bloggers &#124; Education IT &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-149874</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Law students offer Election Day tips for bloggers &#124; Education IT &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-149874</guid>
		<description>[...] report on state law affectng bloggers offers some legal perspective on such questions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] report on state law affectng bloggers offers some legal perspective on such questions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Compass &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Election Day: No Donuts for You</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-149708</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Compass &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Election Day: No Donuts for You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 17:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-149708</guid>
		<description>[...] By the way, did you know that state laws vary on polling place photography? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By the way, did you know that state laws vary on polling place photography? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spark Minute » Blog Archive &#187; CNN covers robocall Republicans. Hacking Democracy on Google Video. Can I photograph my polling place?</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-149320</link>
		<dc:creator>Spark Minute » Blog Archive &#187; CNN covers robocall Republicans. Hacking Democracy on Google Video. Can I photograph my polling place?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-149320</guid>
		<description>[...] all this controversy, you&#8217;re probably asking yourself, &#8220;Can I photograph my polling place?&#8221; Well, it varies state by state. But in California you&#8217;re not allowed to photograph or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all this controversy, you&#8217;re probably asking yourself, &#8220;Can I photograph my polling place?&#8221; Well, it varies state by state. But in California you&#8217;re not allowed to photograph or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexerati: Smart Sex. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Election Day Postgame: Vote Your Local Leatherman and Escort</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-23528</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexerati: Smart Sex. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Election Day Postgame: Vote Your Local Leatherman and Escort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-23528</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not sure I was actually breaking the law by taking this photo at the polling station, but as the count is in, why not? It&#8217;s not every day one gets to cast one&#8217;s ballot for an out supporter of the Leatherman&#8217;s community. Who won with 87% of the vote in his race for State Assembly. (Unlike self-identified escort/stripper Starchild, who is still yet to concede his run for San Francisco Board of Supervisors.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not sure I was actually breaking the law by taking this photo at the polling station, but as the count is in, why not? It&#8217;s not every day one gets to cast one&#8217;s ballot for an out supporter of the Leatherman&#8217;s community. Who won with 87% of the vote in his race for State Assembly. (Unlike self-identified escort/stripper Starchild, who is still yet to concede his run for San Francisco Board of Supervisors.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Year&#8217;s election &#171; Photography on Tap</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-22589</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Year&#8217;s election &#171; Photography on Tap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-22589</guid>
		<description>[...] Laws by State for all of you citizen photojournalists looking to shoot your polling place next year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Laws by State for all of you citizen photojournalists looking to shoot your polling place next year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VOTE! at A New Wave of Thinking</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21772</link>
		<dc:creator>VOTE! at A New Wave of Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21772</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, if can take photos (or video) at the polls, as Josh Hallett is doing for the AIGA Polling Place Photo Project, read this post on state laws regulating polling place photography. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, if can take photos (or video) at the polls, as Josh Hallett is doing for the AIGA Polling Place Photo Project, read this post on state laws regulating polling place photography. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akkam&#8217;s Razor</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21744</link>
		<dc:creator>Akkam&#8217;s Razor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21744</guid>
		<description>[...] If you are going to participate in VideotheVote.org or the Polling Place Photo Project, it&#39;d be a good idea to check what the state laws are regarding photo-place photography (via BoingBoing). Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you are going to participate in VideotheVote.org or the Polling Place Photo Project, it&#39;d be a good idea to check what the state laws are regarding photo-place photography (via BoingBoing). Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Sam</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21737</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21737</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Massachusetts&lt;/b&gt;

Peter Trip wrote: &lt;i&gt;The use of electronic means such as tape recording equipment or radio broadcasting equipment for the recording or broadcasting of the names of voters not yet checked as having voted shall be prohibited.&lt;/i&gt;

Campaign and/or "get out the vote" workers are allowed (have been, so far) to take notes &lt;i&gt;from time to time&lt;/i&gt; of those registered voters who have not yet voted. Campaign workers then pass these names on to phone bank workers (usually volunteers) who attempt to call the registered voter to remind them to vote (often with a plug for their candidate of choice).

Copies of registered voters are readily available to the public (sometimes called a "True List" -- which makes it fairly easy to quickly view and compare the list of those who have voted and mark those who haven't on one's own list. 

My anecdotal understanding is that such comparisons may only be done when doing so will not interfere with registered voters in the process of checking in (or out) with the election workers. The rule of the Assistant or Deputy Registrar at the polling location is absolute. Nonetheless, my experience is that these updates on who hasn't voted are made many times during the day and early evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Massachusetts</b></p>
<p>Peter Trip wrote: <i>The use of electronic means such as tape recording equipment or radio broadcasting equipment for the recording or broadcasting of the names of voters not yet checked as having voted shall be prohibited.</i></p>
<p>Campaign and/or &#8220;get out the vote&#8221; workers are allowed (have been, so far) to take notes <i>from time to time</i> of those registered voters who have not yet voted. Campaign workers then pass these names on to phone bank workers (usually volunteers) who attempt to call the registered voter to remind them to vote (often with a plug for their candidate of choice).</p>
<p>Copies of registered voters are readily available to the public (sometimes called a &#8220;True List&#8221; &#8212; which makes it fairly easy to quickly view and compare the list of those who have voted and mark those who haven&#8217;t on one&#8217;s own list. </p>
<p>My anecdotal understanding is that such comparisons may only be done when doing so will not interfere with registered voters in the process of checking in (or out) with the election workers. The rule of the Assistant or Deputy Registrar at the polling location is absolute. Nonetheless, my experience is that these updates on who hasn&#8217;t voted are made many times during the day and early evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithras</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/11/06/state-laws-vary-on-polling-place-photography/#comment-21718</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this info.

The South Carolina information appears out of order, before the Rhode Island information, and the state name is not bolded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this info.</p>
<p>The South Carolina information appears out of order, before the Rhode Island information, and the state name is not bolded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
