<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashdot readers interview Jay Rosen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/26/slashdot-readers-interview-jay-rosen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/26/slashdot-readers-interview-jay-rosen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/26/slashdot-readers-interview-jay-rosen/#comment-13243</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/26/slashdot-readers-interview-jay-rosen/#comment-13243</guid>
		<description>"first widely known sites in the US to use a reputation system to influence  which stories appeared ..."

??? You may be thinking of Kuro5hin.org, which was started for that reason.

Slashdot has never, ever, allowed user reputation to influence the front page. It's always been top-down, absolute editorial control - in fact, to the extent that some editors were infamous for being abusive or playing favorites with their friends. 

The comment-pit is as you say, and that was indeed innovative - though note some editors have also been known to abuse power there too (though I'd grant the accusation is certainly made more often that warranted - but the problem is you can't tell!).

I think you're right about the challenge. It's the old popular vs. accurate problem, and editorial fiat thrown in for good measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;first widely known sites in the US to use a reputation system to influence  which stories appeared &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>??? You may be thinking of Kuro5hin.org, which was started for that reason.</p>
<p>Slashdot has never, ever, allowed user reputation to influence the front page. It&#8217;s always been top-down, absolute editorial control - in fact, to the extent that some editors were infamous for being abusive or playing favorites with their friends. </p>
<p>The comment-pit is as you say, and that was indeed innovative - though note some editors have also been known to abuse power there too (though I&#8217;d grant the accusation is certainly made more often that warranted - but the problem is you can&#8217;t tell!).</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right about the challenge. It&#8217;s the old popular vs. accurate problem, and editorial fiat thrown in for good measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
