<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skepticism Must Define Modern Media Literacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mais cepticismo - urgente &#171; Atrium - Media e Cidadania</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Mais cepticismo - urgente &#171; Atrium - Media e Cidadania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>[...] Se Warhol nos abriu as portas a um mundo em que todos teriamos acesso a 15 minutos de fama há quem nos diga agora (o controverso artista britânico Bansky) que no futuro próximo todos vamos poder ser anónimos por 15 minutos. A auto-publicação é, a cada ano que passa e a cada nova onda de ferramentas e utensílios que surge, cada vez mais parte da existência de um número maior de pessoas mas isso não é necessariamente mau (como parece sugerir o mais recente famoso/marginal do mundo da arte contemporânea). Por isso me parece mais honesta a variação da conhecida frase proposta por David Weinberger: todos vamos ser famosos para 15 pessoas. Assim sendo, importará saber viver num novo mundo mediático de múltiplas vozes sabendo distingui-las por algo mais do que os decibéis do volume.  A chave - diz-nos Dan Gillmor - está no cepticismo; deve ser grande e permanente. I hope people will learn not to immediately believe anything they read, hear, or see in whatever medium - positive or negative - unless it&#8217;s from a source they have come to trust. A dollop of skepticism will go far. This means something more: Trust will be harder than ever to earn. But once it is, it&#8217;ll probably also have more staying power. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Se Warhol nos abriu as portas a um mundo em que todos teriamos acesso a 15 minutos de fama há quem nos diga agora (o controverso artista britânico Bansky) que no futuro próximo todos vamos poder ser anónimos por 15 minutos. A auto-publicação é, a cada ano que passa e a cada nova onda de ferramentas e utensílios que surge, cada vez mais parte da existência de um número maior de pessoas mas isso não é necessariamente mau (como parece sugerir o mais recente famoso/marginal do mundo da arte contemporânea). Por isso me parece mais honesta a variação da conhecida frase proposta por David Weinberger: todos vamos ser famosos para 15 pessoas. Assim sendo, importará saber viver num novo mundo mediático de múltiplas vozes sabendo distingui-las por algo mais do que os decibéis do volume.  A chave &#8211; diz-nos Dan Gillmor &#8211; está no cepticismo; deve ser grande e permanente. I hope people will learn not to immediately believe anything they read, hear, or see in whatever medium &#8211; positive or negative &#8211; unless it&#8217;s from a source they have come to trust. A dollop of skepticism will go far. This means something more: Trust will be harder than ever to earn. But once it is, it&#8217;ll probably also have more staying power. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gillmor</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Gillmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Seth, this is one of my goals over time -- to push hard for this level of skepticism among nonprofessional communicators. (If my only audience is the pros, then I&#039;m going to fail.)

Some PR folks will undoubtedly see this medium as a way to fool people, and I hope that there will be enough brains and eyeballs out here to call them on such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, this is one of my goals over time &#8212; to push hard for this level of skepticism among nonprofessional communicators. (If my only audience is the pros, then I&#8217;m going to fail.)</p>
<p>Some PR folks will undoubtedly see this medium as a way to fool people, and I hope that there will be enough brains and eyeballs out here to call them on such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Noble sentiments. But what if your audience - which, after all, is professional manipulators  - draws the exact opposite conclusion than you intend? While people *should* &quot;learn not to immediately believe anything they read&quot;, suppose the PR flacks work from the premise that they *will* believe it anyway? And so there&#039;s a whole new set of opportunites now for faking sincerity and gaining false trust. In a nutshell, &quot;Truthiness&quot;.

By the way, though David Weinberger may have independently invented the quote, no harm in that, it does pre-date him, usually to a 1991 essay by &quot;Momus&quot;.

http://imomus.com/index499.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noble sentiments. But what if your audience &#8211; which, after all, is professional manipulators  &#8211; draws the exact opposite conclusion than you intend? While people *should* &#8220;learn not to immediately believe anything they read&#8221;, suppose the PR flacks work from the premise that they *will* believe it anyway? And so there&#8217;s a whole new set of opportunites now for faking sincerity and gaining false trust. In a nutshell, &#8220;Truthiness&#8221;.</p>
<p>By the way, though David Weinberger may have independently invented the quote, no harm in that, it does pre-date him, usually to a 1991 essay by &#8220;Momus&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://imomus.com/index499.html" rel="nofollow">http://imomus.com/index499.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s wonderful that Dan&#039;s talking about media literacy, but quite humorous that he refers to &quot;old-fashioned media literacy&quot; when educators and advocates have been struggling for a few decades here in the U.S. to get general public recognition and understanding of the mere phrase &quot;media literacy&quot; anywhere above the 20-30% threshold (I&#039;m guessing at this figure but it&#039;s nowhere near even 50%).

The most comprehensive conference for teaching and learning about media literacy (the bi-annual National Media Education Conference) will be the last weekend in June of 2007 in St. Louis, Missouri. I&#039;m doing volunteer publicity work for it. If interested visit http://www.amlainfo.org. There&#039;s minimal conference info on there right now but you can check out the sponsoring group of good folks, the Alliance for a Media Literate America.

Use the Contact form (link on bottom nav bar) to request that you be added to an email list they will develop for conference updates. (And I&#039;ll ask them to install an easy sign-up form for getting conference email notices.)
Susan Rogers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s wonderful that Dan&#8217;s talking about media literacy, but quite humorous that he refers to &#8220;old-fashioned media literacy&#8221; when educators and advocates have been struggling for a few decades here in the U.S. to get general public recognition and understanding of the mere phrase &#8220;media literacy&#8221; anywhere above the 20-30% threshold (I&#8217;m guessing at this figure but it&#8217;s nowhere near even 50%).</p>
<p>The most comprehensive conference for teaching and learning about media literacy (the bi-annual National Media Education Conference) will be the last weekend in June of 2007 in St. Louis, Missouri. I&#8217;m doing volunteer publicity work for it. If interested visit <a href="http://www.amlainfo.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.amlainfo.org</a>. There&#8217;s minimal conference info on there right now but you can check out the sponsoring group of good folks, the Alliance for a Media Literate America.</p>
<p>Use the Contact form (link on bottom nav bar) to request that you be added to an email list they will develop for conference updates. (And I&#8217;ll ask them to install an easy sign-up form for getting conference email notices.)<br />
Susan Rogers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/09/18/skepticism-must-define-modern-media-literacy/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>And, according to hip British artist Banksy:

&quot;in the future everyone will be anonymous for 15 minutes.&quot;

http://supertouchblog.com/?p=317#more-317
(scroll 22 photos down to the PINK TELEVISION)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, according to hip British artist Banksy:</p>
<p>&#8220;in the future everyone will be anonymous for 15 minutes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://supertouchblog.com/?p=317#more-317" rel="nofollow">http://supertouchblog.com/?p=317#more-317</a><br />
(scroll 22 photos down to the PINK TELEVISION)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

