<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Bug Thwarts Online Journalism Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/27/software-bug-thwarts-online-journalism-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/27/software-bug-thwarts-online-journalism-feature/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dickson</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/27/software-bug-thwarts-online-journalism-feature/#comment-6042</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/27/software-bug-thwarts-online-journalism-feature/#comment-6042</guid>
		<description>Anyone looking to do something similar in the citizen journalism context could do worse than post documents they wish to annotate on Flickr.com - the 'note' functionality allows you 300 characters maximum. And it works great on Firefox too. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone looking to do something similar in the citizen journalism context could do worse than post documents they wish to annotate on Flickr.com - the &#8216;note&#8217; functionality allows you 300 characters maximum. And it works great on Firefox too. <img src='http://citmedia.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McChris</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/27/software-bug-thwarts-online-journalism-feature/#comment-6026</link>
		<dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/27/software-bug-thwarts-online-journalism-feature/#comment-6026</guid>
		<description>I took a cursory look at the page coding for the rollovers, and it appears that Slate is just using alt tags to display the text. Firefox has its problems, but they seem to do a pretty good job of rendering pages in standards-compliant ways. I don't think the alt tag is supposed to wrap text, so Slate probably should have used more complex Ajax-style coding to have more control over how the rollover text displays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a cursory look at the page coding for the rollovers, and it appears that Slate is just using alt tags to display the text. Firefox has its problems, but they seem to do a pretty good job of rendering pages in standards-compliant ways. I don&#8217;t think the alt tag is supposed to wrap text, so Slate probably should have used more complex Ajax-style coding to have more control over how the rollover text displays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
