<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accountability is a Reader&#039;s Choice, Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/26/accountability-is-a-readers-choice-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/26/accountability-is-a-readers-choice-too/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/26/accountability-is-a-readers-choice-too/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/26/accountability-is-a-readers-choice-too/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s expressed badly, because to express it well requires some unpleasant politics, some of which can&#039;t be said bluntly, exactly because of that politics. But there is a real conflict underlying it, and it&#039;s a disservice to focus on the clumsy way that the descriptions come out.

Roughly - &quot;Currently, we have a professionized system where various political factions have a mutally interlocking arrangement in order to keep the peace. Some other factions want to destroy this professionalized system and replace it with something much close to a tribal might-makes-right, and the strongest wins. We don&#039;t think the latter is a good way to organize the political world. The would-be faction-warlords think it&#039;s a great way to organize the political world&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s expressed badly, because to express it well requires some unpleasant politics, some of which can&#8217;t be said bluntly, exactly because of that politics. But there is a real conflict underlying it, and it&#8217;s a disservice to focus on the clumsy way that the descriptions come out.</p>
<p>Roughly &#8211; &#8220;Currently, we have a professionized system where various political factions have a mutally interlocking arrangement in order to keep the peace. Some other factions want to destroy this professionalized system and replace it with something much close to a tribal might-makes-right, and the strongest wins. We don&#8217;t think the latter is a good way to organize the political world. The would-be faction-warlords think it&#8217;s a great way to organize the political world&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

