http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/06/27/the-first-amendment-is-for-everyone/ Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/06/27/the-first-amendment-is-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-289 brigitte nacos Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:46:05 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/06/27/the-first-amendment-is-for-everyone/#comment-289 yes, the WSJ and the LAT also had stories about this follow-the-money schema that was not as secret as the NYT's attackers make it out now. As I listened last night to the talking heads, such as Representative Roberts, it was obvious that they are not after the other papers--only the NYT. Roberts, in spite of CNN's Blitzer's repeated efforts, could not bring himself to say Wall Street Journal --instead, strangely, he mentioned the Washington Post. I am sure we'll witness the same in the House today. yes, the WSJ and the LAT also had stories about this follow-the-money schema that was not as secret as the NYT’s attackers make it out now. As I listened last night to the talking heads, such as Representative Roberts, it was obvious that they are not after the other papers–only the NYT. Roberts, in spite of CNN’s Blitzer’s repeated efforts, could not bring himself to say Wall Street Journal –instead, strangely, he mentioned the Washington Post. I am sure we’ll witness the same in the House today.

]]> http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/06/27/the-first-amendment-is-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-288 Michael Gorsuch Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:19:13 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/06/27/the-first-amendment-is-for-everyone/#comment-288 Didn't The Wallstreet Journal carry this story as well? It's interesting that these same folks aren't talking about that... Didn’t The Wallstreet Journal carry this story as well? It’s interesting that these same folks aren’t talking about that…

]]>