Comments on: Wireless Reality http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:24:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: me63 / Matt Edgar » What we say versus what we see http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/#comment-4880 me63 / Matt Edgar » What we say versus what we see Fri, 07 Jul 2006 23:19:07 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/#comment-4880 [...] But the thing is, if I’m going to carry around a “reality acquisition device,” I’d like to to acquire the whole of reality as I experience it, not just the bits that can be captured directly as light waves or sound waves. [...] [...] But the thing is, if I’m going to carry around a “reality acquisition device,” I’d like to to acquire the whole of reality as I experience it, not just the bits that can be captured directly as light waves or sound waves. [...]

]]> By: wendy http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/#comment-3083 wendy Wed, 31 May 2006 19:31:07 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/#comment-3083 ha! I really got a chuckle from this entry. I wonder why our culture currently has this obsession with the word "reality" (ie. reality TV shows) just when, in many ways, it seems to be so out of touch with reality...It seems that many of our top politicians also have reality distortion fields -- that even dropping approval ratings can't break through! ha! I really got a chuckle from this entry. I wonder why our culture currently has this obsession with the word “reality” (ie. reality TV shows) just when, in many ways, it seems to be so out of touch with reality…It seems that many of our top politicians also have reality distortion fields — that even dropping approval ratings can’t break through!

]]> By: steven http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/#comment-3082 steven Wed, 31 May 2006 17:00:26 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/05/31/wireless-reality/#comment-3082 Actually, as overblown or splendiferous as the term sounds, there's definite marketing potential there. I can just imagine a commercial with a bunch of teenagers doing a "Who's on First?" routine... Teen A: What's that PDA thing? Teen B: Oh, it's RAD, right? Teen A: Yeah. Totally! But what is it? Teen B: It's a RAD. etc. etc. Actually, as overblown or splendiferous as the term sounds, there’s definite marketing potential there. I can just imagine a commercial with a bunch of teenagers doing a “Who’s on First?” routine…

Teen A: What’s that PDA thing?
Teen B: Oh, it’s RAD, right?
Teen A: Yeah. Totally! But what is it?
Teen B: It’s a RAD.

etc. etc.

]]>