<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspaper Faces Tomorrow by Retreating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/04/29/newspapers-faces-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/04/29/newspapers-faces-tomorrow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna Haynes</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/04/29/newspapers-faces-tomorrow/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/04/29/newspapers-to-fight-web-by-turning-back-clock/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>&#62; "tries to make publications easier to read on a computer screen..."

um, yeah. 
"In order to serve you better, ..."

Funny how they never seem to base these decisions on the customers' expressed needs, but still employ customer-centric justifications after-the-fact.

Like remodeling cubicles "in order to improve the workers' self esteem" in the wake of a massive layoff.

A blog equivalent, that I've seen in newspapers, is "in order to make it easier to skip from post to post..."  - to justify pruning the posts and comments so that if you want to read more than the first sentence or so, you have to click through to a separate page for each comment and for each post.

some poor PR person has a job, and they're doing the best they can with what they have to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;tries to make publications easier to read on a computer screen&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>um, yeah.<br />
&#8220;In order to serve you better, &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny how they never seem to base these decisions on the customers&#8217; expressed needs, but still employ customer-centric justifications after-the-fact.</p>
<p>Like remodeling cubicles &#8220;in order to improve the workers&#8217; self esteem&#8221; in the wake of a massive layoff.</p>
<p>A blog equivalent, that I&#8217;ve seen in newspapers, is &#8220;in order to make it easier to skip from post to post&#8230;&#8221;  - to justify pruning the posts and comments so that if you want to read more than the first sentence or so, you have to click through to a separate page for each comment and for each post.</p>
<p>some poor PR person has a job, and they&#8217;re doing the best they can with what they have to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/04/29/newspapers-faces-tomorrow/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/04/29/newspapers-to-fight-web-by-turning-back-clock/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Good luck NY Times. With the advent of blogs, I only glance at your paper (or any other MSM site) when I find an interesting link from one of the many blogs I read on a daily basis, it seems I might be even less likely to visit now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck NY Times. With the advent of blogs, I only glance at your paper (or any other MSM site) when I find an interesting link from one of the many blogs I read on a daily basis, it seems I might be even less likely to visit now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
