<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biting the Hand that Feeds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/02/01/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/02/01/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Dynamic links are newspapers weapon against unwelcomed deep linking</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/02/01/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Dynamic links are newspapers weapon against unwelcomed deep linking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/02/01/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Gillmor wonders if this is biting the hand that feeds and the answer is of course, yes. It&#8217;s already working with me but I&#8217;m just one miniscule section of the internet. One of the fastest ways to guarantee that I don&#8217;t read your publication or link to it is to change the link to the source after some period of time. This is considered very anti-webmaster behavior. In some niche online businesses (link lists, for example) this can get all of your sites blacklisted. It&#8217;s a form of redirection and it&#8217;s bad netiquette. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Gillmor wonders if this is biting the hand that feeds and the answer is of course, yes. It&#8217;s already working with me but I&#8217;m just one miniscule section of the internet. One of the fastest ways to guarantee that I don&#8217;t read your publication or link to it is to change the link to the source after some period of time. This is considered very anti-webmaster behavior. In some niche online businesses (link lists, for example) this can get all of your sites blacklisted. It&#8217;s a form of redirection and it&#8217;s bad netiquette. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig McGinty</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/02/01/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig McGinty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/02/01/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>If some newspapers are seriously considering firewalling Google then it just means more power to citizen journalist projects.

A lot less competition for those who want to talk to people and keep them in touch with what they care aboout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some newspapers are seriously considering firewalling Google then it just means more power to citizen journalist projects.</p>
<p>A lot less competition for those who want to talk to people and keep them in touch with what they care aboout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
