<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post Fixing Comments, not Killing Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/24/washington-post-fixing-comments-not-killing-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/24/washington-post-fixing-comments-not-killing-them/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Department of Growing a Thicker Skin &#124; Center for Citizen Media: Blog</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/24/washington-post-fixing-comments-not-killing-them/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Department of Growing a Thicker Skin &#124; Center for Citizen Media: Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/24/washington-post-fixing-comments-not-killing-them/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] Brady points out, correctly, that the Abramoff scandal&#8217;s unveiling is due in large part to the Post&#8217;s own reporting: brilliant and dogged tracking of this sleazy activity that should make the paper proud. But he doesn&#8217;t acknowledge that the Post&#8217;s online arm enabled the hate-fest by not making its comment system more robust and less prone to gaming. (He knows about the problem, having told me so in a recent email.) Brady somewhat undermines his complaints with this omission. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brady points out, correctly, that the Abramoff scandal&#8217;s unveiling is due in large part to the Post&#8217;s own reporting: brilliant and dogged tracking of this sleazy activity that should make the paper proud. But he doesn&#8217;t acknowledge that the Post&#8217;s online arm enabled the hate-fest by not making its comment system more robust and less prone to gaming. (He knows about the problem, having told me so in a recent email.) Brady somewhat undermines his complaints with this omission. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A t r i u m  - media e cidadania</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/24/washington-post-fixing-comments-not-killing-them/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>A t r i u m  - media e cidadania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/24/washington-post-fixing-comments-not-killing-them/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Leitores também transparentes...&lt;/strong&gt;

O aumento das formas de participação no discurso mediático abriu, naturalmente, um espaço por onde circula não apenas opinião organizada, debate esclarecido, ou informação fundamentada. Circula muito mais - falsidades, rumores, insultos, por exemplo. N...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Leitores também transparentes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>O aumento das formas de participação no discurso mediático abriu, naturalmente, um espaço por onde circula não apenas opinião organizada, debate esclarecido, ou informação fundamentada. Circula muito mais - falsidades, rumores, insultos, por exemplo. N&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
