<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists Having Transparency Imposed on Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Krempasky.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Web 2.0 CEO</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Krempasky.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Web 2.0 CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] But it’s a harbinger of a changed situation for journalists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But it’s a harbinger of a changed situation for journalists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProPr &#187; Another CEO uses his blog to level the playing field with a reporter</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>ProPr &#187; Another CEO uses his blog to level the playing field with a reporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Mathew Ingram has written in today&#8217;s Globe and Mail about Patrick Byrne, CEO of Overstock.com, using his blog for an online tussle with Business Week reporter, Tim Mullaney. Ingram concludes: &#8220;&#8230; the ability to post your comments on a story to your blog, as Mr. Cuban did, or to post the interview and your responses even before the article runs, as Mr. Byrne did, is a pretty powerful tool. And they are not unique: as journalist and blogger Dan Gillmor notes, the U.S. Defence Department has been posting full transcripts of its interviews with journalists for a while now. As Mr. Gillmor notes on his Citizens&#8217; Media blog, journalists are effectively having &#8220;transparency imposed on them&#8221; by the Internet.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mathew Ingram has written in today&#8217;s Globe and Mail about Patrick Byrne, CEO of Overstock.com, using his blog for an online tussle with Business Week reporter, Tim Mullaney. Ingram concludes: &#8220;&#8230; the ability to post your comments on a story to your blog, as Mr. Cuban did, or to post the interview and your responses even before the article runs, as Mr. Byrne did, is a pretty powerful tool. And they are not unique: as journalist and blogger Dan Gillmor notes, the U.S. Defence Department has been posting full transcripts of its interviews with journalists for a while now. As Mr. Gillmor notes on his Citizens&#8217; Media blog, journalists are effectively having &#8220;transparency imposed on them&#8221; by the Internet.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medicalwriter</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>medicalwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>It is a violation of copyright to repost an email without the orginal author's permission. If the Business Week journalist was smart, he'd sue the Overstock CEO. 

As for transcribing interviews, that requires taping of the interview. In the US at least, it is illegal to secretly tape someone for any purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a violation of copyright to repost an email without the orginal author&#8217;s permission. If the Business Week journalist was smart, he&#8217;d sue the Overstock CEO. </p>
<p>As for transcribing interviews, that requires taping of the interview. In the US at least, it is illegal to secretly tape someone for any purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Hodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fighting Fire with Fire... Turning the tables on Media...&lt;/strong&gt;

So... has the posting of media interview transcripts by interviewees -- even before the article is published......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fighting Fire with Fire&#8230; Turning the tables on Media&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So&#8230; has the posting of media interview transcripts by interviewees &#8211; even before the article is published&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Hodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fighting fire with fire?... ...&lt;/strong&gt;

So... is posting transcripts of interviews with journalists the latest trend in communications? Dan Gillmor......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fighting fire with fire?&#8230; &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So&#8230; is posting transcripts of interviews with journalists the latest trend in communications? Dan Gillmor&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Roush</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I'm not necessarily upset with what Byrne did to Mullaney, but I do think Mullaney, the journalist, overstepped his boundaries with his response, which was also posted online, if we are to trust the posting on The Sanity Check Web site.

I have blogged about this here: http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=272</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not necessarily upset with what Byrne did to Mullaney, but I do think Mullaney, the journalist, overstepped his boundaries with his response, which was also posted online, if we are to trust the posting on The Sanity Check Web site.</p>
<p>I have blogged about this here: <a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=272" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=272</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; More on Overstock/BusinessWeek tussle</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; More on Overstock/BusinessWeek tussle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogger expert Dan Gillmor wrote about the issue on his blog at Center for Citizen Media today and stated: &#8220;This isn’t an entirely new phenomenon. In We the Media I noted that the Pentagon has been posting transcripts of major interviews with the defense secretary (I cited this one in particular), and others have posted such exchanges as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogger expert Dan Gillmor wrote about the issue on his blog at Center for Citizen Media today and stated: &#8220;This isn’t an entirely new phenomenon. In We the Media I noted that the Pentagon has been posting transcripts of major interviews with the defense secretary (I cited this one in particular), and others have posted such exchanges as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Paul Jones &#187; Turning tables on Journalists</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Paul Jones &#187; Turning tables on Journalists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] My collegue Chris Roush on his Talking Biz News Blog takes the story of a BusinessWeek reporter who has his email interview questions posted by the interviewee. I disagree with Chris and point to Dan Gillmor&#8217;s book in the comments. Dan touches on the story on his own blog for the Center for Citizen Media. Also in the comments on Chris&#8217; blog, thesanitycheck.com folks post a comment and a traceback to the interviewee&#8217;s reply. Then Chris publishes this update: BusinessWeek reporter calls and is mad; Overstock head responds on Internet again. The reporter hasn&#8217;t caught on yet. Of course I posted a comment to Dan&#8217;s blog telling him and his readers about Chris&#8217;s posts. Got all that? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My collegue Chris Roush on his Talking Biz News Blog takes the story of a BusinessWeek reporter who has his email interview questions posted by the interviewee. I disagree with Chris and point to Dan Gillmor&#8217;s book in the comments. Dan touches on the story on his own blog for the Center for Citizen Media. Also in the comments on Chris&#8217; blog, thesanitycheck.com folks post a comment and a traceback to the interviewee&#8217;s reply. Then Chris publishes this update: BusinessWeek reporter calls and is mad; Overstock head responds on Internet again. The reporter hasn&#8217;t caught on yet. Of course I posted a comment to Dan&#8217;s blog telling him and his readers about Chris&#8217;s posts. Got all that? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjones</title>
		<link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>pjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/16/journalists-having-transparency-imposed-on-them/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>My collegue Chris Roush on his&lt;a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/" rel="nofollow"&gt; Talking Biz News Blog&lt;/a&gt; takes &lt;a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=262" rel="nofollow"&gt;this story up from the side of BusinessWeek.&lt;/a&gt; 
I disagree and &lt;a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=262#comment-197" rel="nofollow"&gt;point to Dan's book in the comments.&lt;/a&gt;
Also in the comments, sanitycheck.com folks reply.
Then Chris publishes this update: &lt;a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=272" rel="nofollow"&gt;BusinessWeek reporter calls and is mad; Overstock head responds on Internet again&lt;/a&gt;. The reporter hasn't caught on yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My collegue Chris Roush on his<a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/" rel="nofollow"> Talking Biz News Blog</a> takes <a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=262" rel="nofollow">this story up from the side of BusinessWeek.</a><br />
I disagree and <a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=262#comment-197" rel="nofollow">point to Dan&#8217;s book in the comments.</a><br />
Also in the comments, sanitycheck.com folks reply.<br />
Then Chris publishes this update: <a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=272" rel="nofollow">BusinessWeek reporter calls and is mad; Overstock head responds on Internet again</a>. The reporter hasn&#8217;t caught on yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
