Comments on: Debating a Shield Law for Journalists http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/ Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:49:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: pjones http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-15 pjones Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:52:13 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/#comment-15 Yes. Here's the link to <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060116fa_fact" rel="nofollow">Name That Source</a>. Or in case links aren't being handled in comments: http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060116fa_fact Yes. Here’s the link to Name That Source.
Or in case links aren’t being handled in comments:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060116fa_fact

]]> By: The Real Paul Jones » Shield law for bloggers — or for any Journalist for that matter http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-14 The Real Paul Jones » Shield law for bloggers — or for any Journalist for that matter Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:46:07 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/#comment-14 [...] Dan Gillmor writes from the American Bar Association’s Communications Law conference where a mock Senate hearing about the so-called “Free Flow of Information Act” was underway. As I comment on Dan’s blog (can’t see how to do a trackback there): Jeffery Tobin in the current (Jan 16, 06) New Yorker has a lot to say about the background to this discussion in his article NAME THAT SOURCE Why are the courts leaning on journalists?. Worth a read. [...] [...] Dan Gillmor writes from the American Bar Association’s Communications Law conference where a mock Senate hearing about the so-called “Free Flow of Information Act” was underway. As I comment on Dan’s blog (can’t see how to do a trackback there): Jeffery Tobin in the current (Jan 16, 06) New Yorker has a lot to say about the background to this discussion in his article NAME THAT SOURCE Why are the courts leaning on journalists?. Worth a read. [...]

]]> By: pjones http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-13 pjones Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:35:31 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/#comment-13 <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060116fa_fact" rel="nofollow">yes , right here http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060116fa_fact </a>. I had a mistype in my post that killed the link (yikes). see if this takes. yes , right here http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060116fa_fact .

I had a mistype in my post that killed the link (yikes). see if this takes.

]]> By: Dan Gillmor http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Dan Gillmor Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:10:16 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/#comment-12 Paul, is there a Web link to that article? Paul, is there a Web link to that article?

]]> By: pjones http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/comment-page-1/#comment-11 pjones Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:53:11 +0000 http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/01/14/debating-a-shield-law-for-journalists/#comment-11 Jeffery Tobin in the current (Jan 16, 06) New Yorker</a> has a lot to say about the background to this discussion in his article <em>NAME THAT SOURCE Why are the courts leaning on journalists?</em>. Worth a read. Jeffery
Tobin in the current (Jan 16, 06) New Yorker has a lot to say about the
background to this discussion in his article NAME THAT SOURCE
Why are the courts leaning on journalists?. Worth a read.

]]>